So my typical drive home from work is spent listening to All Things Considered punctuated by bouts of screamed obscenities at the crazed maniac that perpetually cuts me off in traffic and gramps in the lane next to me who insists on driving 25 miles an hour but somehow manages to keep me from changing lanes… Today I managed to rein in the road rage to listen to an interesting newsclip about All Saints Episcopal Church in CA. Apparently they are in danger of losing their tax-exempt status for former rector, Rev. George Regas, delivering an anti-war sermon leading up to the 2004 elections… this investigation comes at an apropos time with the November elections upon us. In case you aren’t versed in the federal tax code that outlines what nonprofits can and can not do, here is a quick history lesson.
From the founding of the country until 1954, churches and other nonprofit organizations were permitted to endorse or oppose candidates for political office. That changed in 1954 when proposed legislation amended the Internal Revenue Code to prohibit nonprofit organizations, including churches, from endorsing or opposing political candidates.
The Internal Revenue Code now expressly prohibits churches and other nonprofit organizations from directly endorsing or opposing political candidates. From 1954 to the present, only one church has ever lost its IRS tax-exempt letter ruling for opposing Bill Clinton for President in 1992.
So, where does this leave us? If All Saints Episcopal does lose it’s tax-exempt status it loses a major source of revenue to the church coiffers since it will no longer be considered a 501(c)4 and potentially anyone who has received a tax deduction from a donation to the church could be audited and assessed a fee on the rolled back charitable donation deduction. So, I know you’re thinking, "blah, blah, blah… Aren’t our first amendment rights important, this is just a blatant exercise by the government to keep the people from voicing their opinions!"
Normally I would agree and jump on the "bash the government" bandwagon but I am so fed up with churches telling parishoners how to vote- it is no longer a first amendment issue but a marketing tool for pastors to push their candidates from the pulpit. Because, of course, if a pastor says "Bush is God’s choice for president!" how many people would stand up, think for themselves, and say, "Really? God’s choice? I didn’t think God was partisan."
This doesn’t mean that I have a problem with churches standing up for their beliefs, go ahead and feed the children in Africa, support the war in Iraq, preach on the moral indignation of homosexuality and abortion; just don’t tell people to pray that Bush becomes president. Pastors can even personally endorse, work for, or contribute to political candidates. Again, I say, don’t use the two feet that you stand higher on your podium than the congregation to espouse your "righteous" politicizing.
Thank you, Good Night, and God Bless.